| HOME • THE WORK • CREATIVES • ARTICLES • EVENTS • LITERATURE • JOBS • ADBLOGS FORUM • DIRECTORY • RESOURCES • ASK JANCY • ACADEMIA • SPONSORS • ABOUT IHAI
|
| IHAVEANIDEA.ORG > ARTICLES > INDUSTRY |
|
| RELATED LINKS |
|
Ms. Kestin:
I am an outsider to the field of advertising, and have to say that I was taken aback by how sexist and misogynistic Mr. French's comments and actions were. The fact that he said them in such a public arena can only imply that this hostile and degrading attitude towards women is entrenched in the advertising business, and has been tacitly, if not explicity, supported by the higher-ups at the agencies. I worked in a male-dominated field 25 years ago. I have personal memories of my (few) female colleagues working up to the day of delivery, some even delaying leaving the office after labor began, afraid to take time away from their jobs lest they be labeled "less dedicated." They came back to work full-time 6-8 weeks after delivery, but did not display pictures of their children or speak of their families. I'm glad Mr. French lost his job, but I still have to say DAMN DAMN DAMN that this kind of stuff is still happening. I had hoped that the work environment for women had progressed farther than this by the year 2005. Posted by Alice
Janet, I've met you, I know you're a smart woman.
Given that, how can you possibly ask people to post their names and opinions? You must realize that you, being a woman, are protected in making your statements. No one could fire you, no one could pressure you to quit - you're a woman. Doing so would be 'sexist'. On the other hand, any man that speaks out can easily get canned or villified for his statements. If it can happen to Neil French, it sure can happen to any one of us. I'm sorry, but you and Nancy have already claimed one casualy as a part of your crusade, and I'm praying you don't claim any more. Women can be brilliant creatives and the last thing you need to achieve that status is a bloody witch hunt. Calling for men to respond with their real contact info is exactly that. Posted by Reality
Janet,
I agree with everything you wrote, with the exception of one line: “It’s interesting that so many people, sadly mostly men, horribly maybe mostly young men, are pillorying Nancy for expressing her counter-argument to Neil’s point of view.” I disagree with the “horribly maybe mostly young men” comment. Don’t mean to create even more controversy, but the issue probably involves both sexism and generational attitudes. If you closely read the thread initiated by Nancy’s essay, you’ll see the complaining men are revealing their ages, mostly by mentioning managerial experiences and observations that can only come from many years in the business. The sad truth is, there appear to be few young men commenting at all. And the majority of them are merely adding sophomoric remarks for amusement versus honest opinions for debate. However, we shouldn’t be too concerned about the old men commenting. The concern should be with the old men who are not commenting. Where are the industry leaders on this issue? Where do Rick Boyko and Mark Fenske stand — especially since they were participants in the original event? Where are Steve Hayden and Martin Sorrell? Where are Keith Reinhardt and Bob Scarpelli? Where are David Bell, Burtch Drake, Mark Tutssel and Lee Clow? The list goes on. But not a single male leader has chimed in. My only other wish would be for you and Nancy to join the discussion. Since her post, there has been virtually zero response from Nancy. Will you also simply post an essay then stand back to watch the responses? In one of my early posts, I wrote: “Want to know the saddest part of this entire mess? No one will censor Neil French or all the other Neil Frenches in our ranks. And my money says Nancy Vonk abandons her revolutionary position by the end of the month.” I’m pleased-yet-astonished to see I was wrong, and French was ultimately censored. But I’m still betting the latter part of my statement holds true. P.S., Janet, circumstances prohibit me from signing my name. But you may certainly email if you wish to continue the discussion. Posted by HighJive
neil french.... is profoundly "up his ass"...
i have been in business for over 30 yrs and owned various businesses in various industries. over the years i have employed many women and have found that most women are more dedicated and work harder at their job than most men. i am a "male", and a very proud father of a 19 yr old daughter who is extremely creative and who is in college studying for a degree in visual communications. sincere regards, rm Posted by r.m.smith
Dear Jancy,
After a lot of thought this weekend, I've found an even greater respect for females in this biz. Especially you two ladies. Not only do you manage your work load and employees, (and doing an award-winning job of it) but you also still find time to nurture the young buds on this site, and more importantly, yours at home. How you do it, I'll never know. Maybe another book?? But now I'm genuinely curious to know why you still feel the need to defend yourselves, again? You know in your hearts that you were right the first time, and that most people on here tend to agree. So wouldn't forgive/forget/move on be a more valuable lesson to both genders now? I know it's a more difficult challenge, but knowing you, it's not impossible. Posted by Frank
I'm not in advertising and I didn't know who Neil was before reading the news about this episode, but he is a casualty of his own neanderthal thinking. What a wonderful mentor he could be for young people going into the advertising business and people in other creative fields - perhaps he will realize that he has a lot to learn about respect for other people (this includes men who should be insulted by his attitude). Women already ARE brilliant creatives.
Posted by Barbara
"But now I'm genuinely curious to know why you still feel the need to defend yourselves, again? "
They are defending themselves again because the hysteria surrounding the first post has died down and they want to keep the discussion in the public eye. Posted by Big Money
Hi
I hate to say this but I have to agree with Niel French. As a recently widowed parent, I find raising 3 kids on my own gave me a new perspective on what women go through when raising a family.(especially on their own) Right now I have no life, all my time is given to my children. I know if I wanted to develope my creative side it would be at the expense of my children, Even now I look at many of my neighbours who are successful businessmen and executives , guess what , it was done at the expense of connecting with their family. You can't have both. Michaek De Vries Posted by Mike De Vries
WOMAN
"If you don't recognize them, you're probably not ready for them." Posted by B.B.
I'm TOTALLY disagree w/ Mr. De Vries. I don't know when this horrible experience occured in your life, but I promise you (as a child from a similar predicament - my condolences), years from now, after your kids have grown up, you'll think differently. Good parenting, and balance in life, comes from experience, practice, trial, and error ... that of which, women have and will have of more of when it comes to child rearing, simply because we are biological bound to it.
Posted by ERB
I am not an ad-woman but I am an artist, and wanted to comment on the fact that when it comes to creativity, women's talents have been woefully undervalued throughout history. How many 'great' or 'genius' women painters can you name? Yeah, okay, besides Georgia O'Keefe. hm.
But don't miss the facts: we have always existed; we just didn't make the papers. Combine this longstanding exclusion with a fast-paced corporate atmosphere and it's really no surprise why the ad industry is still steeping in these outdated attitudes. But in the use of the word 'outdated' read this: universities and graduate programs nationwide are on an average educating more women than men on a scale of 60:40 and in many areas as much as 70:30 % ratio. Oh, we're here. And those of us 'creatives' who will take the time to read all of these posts and feel that sense of outrage in French's comments will tell you: we know we're just as smart, hardworking, and talented. And yes, in addition, we can also give birth to children. Until recently, all standards were built around the standards of men. But we are rapidly changing the standard with our numbers alone, not to mention our abilities. Although French said inexusable things (if he HAD been saying these things about black people, it would have been clear to EVERYONE that he was completely out of line - but mysogyny's always in style, isn't it?) I want to look at this debate positively, and look toward the future of women in creative fields. It's forums like this that make me even more confident that someday soon, one of us will have this guy's job. Posted by lori m
if you babes want respect go out and do great work, don't whine about people like Neil. if you want to take his job do it by being a better creative and winning more awards than him.
jancy has to do things like this for publicity because their work has been shit for ages. that's the sad bit. instead of setting an example for women of going out and proving everyone wrong with amazing their work, they are setting an example of doing poor work and then whining about the situation. Posted by Do it
as the threads for this scenario continue to grow, one thing is apparent: the ad community in canada is pretty bizarre.
Posted by HighJive
I don't think you're wrong. But I have noticed that many posts - with valid points of view - have been removed from this site. If this is going to be a true forum for discussion and criticism, I suggest Ignacio stop censoring it. If you're woman enough to give it, you can be woman enough to take it.
Posted by Lina V
Would it be too far out to wonder if Neil French, sharp that he is, knew his audience exactly and brilliantly executed a strategy to give himself a golden handshake? Maybe he's tired and feels like a rest of his own. I've been contemplating how best to get myself fired from the corporate life (why quit? they'd love that). It's damn hard to do, and being a woman (typically) only makes it harder!
Posted by EM
All this hoopla is great promo for Janet and Nancy - they just published a new book!
Posted by Anonymous
As a black person I motion that you leave us out of this. Replacing female with black is silly and stupid. Neil's opinion, from what I gather, is that you can't breast-feed and be successful (which applies for both white and black females). If he had said you can't be a woman and suceed! You'll have a case. For now you don't, bye!
Posted by Black man
... I have noticed that many posts - with valid points of view - have been removed from this site.
That's not competely true. Upon further review, and prior to this article, I realized that I was just "adding fuel to the fire". So I was man enough to admit that I had made a mistake, and regardless of my annominity, I removed what I thought at the time to be a valid comment. Posted by Frank
And it was a valid comment, regardless of my poor seplling
Posted by Frank
Wow, you have a VERY self-centered view of the world.
"We don’t make enough of our accomplishments, don’t ask for what we deserve, compromise when we shouldn’t, wait till we’re sure before we speak up. We don’t fight for ourselves because nice girls don’t." ?!? All of these things apply to men too, myself included. There are indeed problems in the workplace -- for both women AND men -- but such an absorbed, egocentric, self-serving rant only compounds the problems. Posted by Kurt
Frank,
thanks for clearing up the mystery regarding deleted posts. i would hate to think anyone from ihaveanidea would be editing anything here. despite the fact that a lot of the comments are pretty bizarre. Posted by HighJive
No one has mentioned this bit to my knowledge but there is something disturbing about this whole fiasco, that hasn't quite been touched upon. maybe it's just me.
While we have all been vallidly, and quite correctly defending female creatives-- no one has said much of the fact that deciding to rasie your children instead of being being an overpaid shill is actually not being "crap," at all. My women friends in advertising, besides wanting to give mr. french a chomp in the jugular, have been upset about the implications across the board. but more than a few have been rabidly so about the idea that the few creative women who have decided to quit advertising in order to raise their children, are, by implication, less of a creative. And yet, there is this phenomenon of late 30 to probably 50 something men in advertising who suddenly quit their overpaid jobs to write their novel, develop that screenplay, take a stint on that new sitcom as a writer, go to europe, or simply do something "other." My guess is, upon hearing of these said men, Neil French , and a lot of regular men and women in advertising would probably say "jolly good" and not "they're crap." yet it's the same thing, isnt it? Posted by evan
It's easy to hate advertising, isn't it? All these horribly sexist, juvenile ads get all the headlines. The works that are truly clever, truly memorable and truly effective don't have nearly the impact, at least from a newsmonger's perspective.
So why should people who work in the field be any different? Are there cro-magnons like French working in this field? Yeah, but there are just as many kuckle-draggers (maybe more, heh-heh) working as doctors, lawyers, accountants or shopkeepers. There are lots of great -- and I mean really, really great -- women AND men working in advertising. Women and men approach their jobs differently, it's true... and in tapping these differences, creative work, account work -- ANY work -- gets stronger. Posted by Rich
The thing that bugs me the most about this entire episode is everyone coming to conclusions about the event based on one (now two) womans rendition of the event.
I was there. I know Neil was a bit of an ass. And he did say some things that I didn't agree with. I also know that many of the words Nancy and now Janet have quoted him on were said within a completely different context however. Knowing that, I am ashamed inthe conduct of two women I've respected and admired for ages. I had always thought of them as fair and just, as well sa being top notch creative directors. The fact that they were female didn't even register with me, I simply respected the way they carried themselves. They never came across as the type that would so blatantly manipulate a man's words to get their way. What's worse is how easily the community was riled up, and how little effort people put in to finding out what really happened that night. Janet, Nancy, this is my real e-mail address. I'd love to hear why you wrote as you did. Did you really believe you heard things as you wrote them, and if not, what is your motivation behind quoting Neil out of context? I'd be the first up in arms if Neil simply said women are crap, too. But then that's not all he said, is it? I'd have a lot more respect for your stance if you told more of the truth. Look, i can do the same thing. Here's an excerpt from my fictional news article. In her posting on now-famous advertising portal Ihaveanidea.org, Ogilvy Toronto Creative Director Janet Kestin wrote that "Ambitious women are bitches." Clearly she's horribly sexist. And against her own sex, even! Imagine that. Fire her, fire her right now! Women should be up in arms against this woman keeping other women down! See my point? Posted by Steve
For what it's worth I do I agree about women having as much right to the job as men. My last partner was female and brilliant.
Call me crazy, but I'm a big fan of fair play on both sides of the ball. And for any mistruths Neil may have implied, there's no sense in responding with mistruths in kind. There's got to be better, smarter, ways to attack this issue. Posted by Steve
www.heartnewyork.com
Posted by Heart
Men/women
How many World Wide Creative Directors does it take to piss-off the AD Industry? Apparently, just one. Do you really let the ignorance of other people determine the outcome and path of your career? The ability to make it in this industry and overcome all this prejudice lies in all of us, women and men. Janet and Nancy, Judy John, Loraine and Elspeth and all the other female creative powers are proof that everyone is capable and entitled to being at the top of this industry. Man or woman. The difference between getting there or not depends on who wants it more. And who's willing to sacrifice more to achieve the gold ideas. Be it a man or a woman. Neil's comments (and yes I was there to hear them) were that in "his" travels in other countries he has only noticed that men were making that sacrifice more than women. And to that I say, you should travel to Canada more often. Because here the women work even harder than the men. The real killer of a good creative isn't a man or a woman at all. Complacency is the real road block for most creatives. But that's just my opinion and what the hell do I know. Kevin Posted by slim2k5
Isnt itamazing how white women will cry about sexism but have nothing to say about racism which is a BIGGER evil and blight on humanity, To be fair Ms. Vonk did tocuh on it briefly, but Ms. Kestin seems totally oblivious to this evil which does a lot more damage to people than sexism. At least white women can get a chance to bat, but by and large Blacks cant even get in the stadium.....I guess that is NOT Ms. Kestin or Ms. Vonks concern.
Hell Black foks would love to be in the position white women are in and from my experience white women are NOT any less racists than white males...so I am sitting here reading Ms. Kestin missive thinking this is just a white family having a little internal squabble over the silverware.....The Black man aint got a dog in this fight!! Posted by DaBlackguy
This is getting tee-jus.
Posted by zzzzzzzzz
There's no sexism in advertising.
There is only Neil French, cigars, and way too much time to spare for an old man who has proved his claim to fame is truly about writing, not talking. Posted by ItsAllFunAndGamesTillSomeoneLosesAnEye
“Relax. It's just advertising.”
“It's about time somebody told it like it is. There is no glass ceiling or wage gap” It is in these words and the minds of those who specifically contributed to the 10,000-word count defense that allow conduct like French’s and others to continue to exist. Just recently I had a private conversation with a family friend & CFO of one of the largest companies in the North America, as I wanted to learn what I could from the already established. I asked him what experience has he encountered when it came to the hiring of women in top-level positions. If you think his response was that women have an equal chance at the top level corporate opportunities then no one told you the truth, or you have never lived that reality. “Not only do the female creatives at my agency-- all four of us-- burn the midnight oil, but we are forced to work twice as hard as the guys to find opportunities. It is unfortunate that our economic world can not allow for a leave of absence to create life and respect women for it, let alone punish her. There can be a model for which business incorporates the acceptance of a care giving mother and the strong and powerful business woman. There have been many examples, but there is opportunity for so many more. Posted by BLP
IF you've managed to read this far I'll make it short.
Everyone take a deep breath and realize its only advertising. Ad-ver-tis-ing. Now that the egos are in check, if you really want to make a difference take this one to city hall, heck do a campaign about the slanderous state of advertising...and not just advertising but about the workplace in general. Its fair to say this subject transcends many institutions other than advertising, and while you're at it raise the bar and put racism on your shoulders, because that blood runs thick, and what about Native Aboriginal Canadians the ones we plundered and gave buttons to, or that polluted gutter we call the Don River which is a proverbial sewer...but I digress. We need change let's do something about it instead of bickering on this post. Do something proactive, go to Queens park stand on a bus shelter screaming in protest, that will get the attention of the sea of automatons wearing ipods. Rick Posted by Rick Hodge
i suckle something. I am a creative. I want a room where I can comfortably, privately, and cleanly pump milk formy baby. I want daycare on site. That would be equal treatment and allow me to maintain productivity and what is most important in life: family.
Posted by nyc
Are men attacking women, or are they attacking Nancy Vonk?
Posted by Fud
not convinced the ones attacking nancy can be called men.
Posted by nancy's bodyguard
Yes, because men are meant to sit back and idly watch as women fuck them up the ass.
At least that's the intent of Feminism. Posted by Man
Okay, enough! Seriously, Janet. LET IT GO!!!!
Posted by Call me a friend
You might want to write an article about how it's difficult being a homosexual in the workplace. In some US states, you can be fired for your sexual orientation.
Posted by Call me a friend
Has anyone been to the store on ihaveanidea? Neil French? Please. The whole SITE is sexist. Thong bikini briefs that say, "So you're the Creative Director?"
How can you contribute an advice column to a website that sells merchandise like that given your belief that the advertising industry keeps women in their place? What's the message there? That women only advance in their careers by lying on their backs? And that's okay with you huh? Haven't seen any rants on that subject.... A French maid served Neil drinks on stage. Isn't that a bit sexist? I'm sure you were well aware of this fact before the actual event. When it serves your purpose (promote my book, hang with me in Cannes, be my penpal, give me an advice column) you're willing to turn a blind eye to your sexist 'friends'. Here's an expression for you ladies that I don't think you've ever heard. "A principle is only a principle if it costs you money." Hypocrites. Can't say that about Neil French. I'd rather sit across the boardroom table from an overt sexist, than a covert hypocrite anyday. At least it's an honest exchange. p.s. And why is it all right for women to openly bash men, but if a man wrote a rant talking about women in the same tone as Nancy's posting on ihaveanidea, what happened to Neil would have been NOTHING in comparison. So while you're busy accusing him of being sexist, you're being sexist yourself. Again, hypocritical. Posted by Emma Wellman (NY)
Janet,
Why are you and Nancy playing the hit and run game? WHERE ARE YOU? Is engaging in this dialogue beneath you? You've posted your "Fuel" but you won't attend to your own fire. I'm sure you're reading these posts. Are you laughing at them? Are you denying our feelings and opinions? Do you normally take weeks to calculate a response to a question? Posted by Fud
Maybe, Fud, they've said everything they wanted to say. Maybe their full-time positions as creative directors and family women don't allow them much time to play silly bugger on the Internet. And maybe, just maybe, they're growing a little weary of this endless debate. I know I am.
Posted by Orbit
For starters, Emma, you are 100% right...and I would be glad to work with you any day.
Janet, as I have ranted and raved on here about this whole Neil French fiasco for countless days (with no response from either one of you), I'm running out of fresh, irrefutable points to raise. So here are some reworded old ones: How could you possibly expect us to send you our real names? What purpose does it serve? Is it so you can add all the people who disagree with you to your McCarthy-esque sexism blacklist? You could put your address and phone number on here and STILL sleep well at night! You're protected. You've taken the very real plight of women in this world and signed your name next to the trademark. I believe Nancy even eluded to sleeping at the proverbial discrimination wheel - until now of course! Now, the two of you stand as ill-informed champions of a tired cause: to continue portraying women as poor, helpless victims, rather than what they truly are...namely, a strong force to be reckoned with. Perhaps one best left unquestioned... You pretentious, bourgeois opportunists!! You're still asleep...doing all you can to discriminate and villify from the shelter of your morally superior, falsely feminist, impenetrable corner offices. Do me a favour and hand over one of your paycheques to the women in advertising who are presently being "kept down by the man." Just one. And while you're at it, write an overweight woman a letter explaining why you had to use the word "fat" to qualify the word "fab," or why you felt that retouching was still necessary to make the models look their "best" - instead of simply celebrating these women for who they were. I'm not a woman, but I don't think that "we know, we know - you think she's fat, but to Dove she's fab (call us)" is as groundbreaking to women as your press releases suggest. Which perhaps begs ANOTHER question: is this the story of two brave women who stood up for womankind in the face of a dominant male society (as you would like it to be seen), or is this in fact the story of two women at the top of their game who saw an opportunity to sell a valid issue short for the sake of their huge marketing egos, the ensuing publicity and book sales? Turn the cameras on a Creative Director who makes it her business to sell crap to women, and suddenly she's Rosa Parks. Funny stuff. Posted by Just Another Cog
Ambitious men are driven. Ambitious women are driven. Period. Don't know what advertising industry you work in.
This 'ambitious women are bitches' statement is usually only uttered by an ambitious woman who hasn't owned her ambition. Like it's something to feel guilty about. In my career, I have been called direct, refreshing, authentic, tough, focussed. By men and women. None of which are terms that even resemble "bitch". According to how I choose to hear things. I've also been called a babe, a broad, a dame, a cool chick. By men AND women. Not once did I think any of these words were insulting, or limited my opportunities. I took them in the spirit they were intended. As compliments. Or observations. Doesn't make them true, it's just an observation. I have been called a bitch mostly by other women, in sentences like, "Everything looks good on you, you bitch." "You always win, you bitch." My experience has been that men don't use the word bitch to keep women in line. Women do. It's born out of their own insecurities. I think Janet you should re-examine your value system and see what your beliefs are around ambition and women. I think if you took an honest look you'll see the only thing holding you back are your own self-limiting beliefs. And as a copywriter, you should realize they are only words. You alone are responsible for what you make them mean and/or how you twist them to suit your purpose. You can use them to empower you, or you can use them to stifle you. You're in the driver's seat. Emma p.s. And for the record, men call each other *ssholes and pr*cks and all manner of names in business all the time. To their faces, but just as often behind their backs. But men don't think it's because there's a big conspiracy. It's called com-pe-ti-tion. Posted by Emma Wellman (NY)
I think this post summarises the argument as well as any
http://cathyodgers.blogspot.com/2005/10/one-french-man-who-is-ok.html Posted by Buzzer McKay
Buzzer,
That post actually confuses the issue and taints things dramatically with yet another radical point of view. It's not a summary of any argument except the writer's. The writer is certainly entitled to her opinion, as we all are. But let's not decide anyone has yet presented the answer. Posted by Buzzer Bleep
I have the answer: both ladies who wrote their diatribes should have confronted Neil French in person. But they think backstabbing is OK, as long as it conveys they are holier -than-thou-politically-correct godesses. What GOOD does it do for women out there? Really, fellas, is their opinion so important that they think will change what they think women go through? I don't think so. Nor does Neil's opinion matter. It's just plain witch-hunting. And Neil French is the escaping goat.
Posted by Woman fed up with whiny women
I've read every one of these comments this afternoon, and you know what....
You are all wrong! No one will know until the DVD of the event or footage from it are released. However...I've got a funny feeling that Marty is holding things up and threating ihaveanidea if they release it. Posted by Show Me The Video
I continue to be perplexed by people claiming that Nancy backstabbed Neil, or should have confronted him on a personal level. This argument is bizarre. French appeared as a guest and ultimately spat in the faces of the hosts and other guests. Seems to me he backstabbed Nancy and the other people in the audience --- including men who do not subscribe to his views. Why didn't French go to the women who he claims are friends to apologize or offer explanation? French made his comments without seeking input from others prior to the delivery. Why should Nancy be expected to act any differently? If French is a victim here, then why is no one at WPP standing in his defense? Indeed, the majority of his "supporters" remain anonymous. Quite a devoted following. Look closely at Nancy's essay. She is not personally attacking French. She does not make reference to the state of his knickers. She is speaking in protest of an attitude and actions prevalent in the industry and society. It appears that the DVD of the event is being withheld, no doubt for legal reasons. If it exonerated French in any way, don't you think he'd demand its release? Another post on the event written by an ihaveanidea reporter admits that the moment led to uneasy silence, and some people actually got up and left. So Nancy clearly was not the lone negative respondent. I don't believe Nancy thinks she speaks for all women. She's smart enough to realize others don't share her revulsion. But it's not necessary to get 100 percent compliance to move something forward. Everyone in advertising should realize that.
Posted by JulieM
I have to laugh at all the people commenting from secondary sources. It's hilarious. And it makes an ass out of you and me.
That's right: you fools assume you know what went on at A Night with Neil French without having been there yourself. Really? That's like a virgin explaining what sex is like. I was there. Most of you weren't. And this has been blown way out of proportion. When the DVD is released then come back here an comment after YOU WATCH IT! Posted by Bill
Actually, Bill, what I find interesting is how so many of the people like you criticize others, yet don't offer an opinion of your own. You were there. Speak your mind. Explain it for us virgins.
Posted by JulieM
Additionally, Bill, it appears the DVD will not be released. So people like you really must step up and deliver the truth. Why are you permitting French to be unnecessarily vilified?
Posted by JulieM
Also, Bill, did you happen to note how many drinks the French maid brought Neil before he served up his dumplings of wisdom? I'm thinking this whole story would've had a happier ending if he'd stuck to apple juice.
Posted by Johnnie Walker
You guys are seriously still talking about this?
Posted by Steve
Is Johnny Walker implying French is an alcoholic?
Posted by Steve
Not at all. Johnnie knows from personal experience that a couple of drinks can make a person believe that he's being wonderfully sparkling and witty, particularly when he's not.
Posted by Johnnie Walker
Who's that second Steve, I was framed.
Posted by Steve
If you step back a pace or so, it looks like most of the stuff we promote with our advertising campaigns is purchased by women, so it would make good business sense to include women in the process of deciding how to advertise it.
The whole argument reminds me of how decades ago people would have angry arguments about whether it was a good thing or a bad thing that computers were eliminating jobs, and now years later we just use them because it's the best way to get the work done. Posted by Sonny Keyes
"...so it would make good business sense to include women in the process of deciding how to advertise it."
How aren't they already included in the process? Have you seen the account execs and managers in most agencies? While some might cry foul when there is a lot more testosterone than estrogen in a creative department, I've never been in an agency where the account department was less than, say 75% female. Posted by All's Fair
Please don't jump to conclusions. I said it would make good business sense; I didn't say that such business sense wasn't being implemented.
BTW what reasons can you think of why the women end up in the account dept. instead of the creative dept.? Posted by Sonny Keyes
Sonny Keyes,
I think there are fewer male AEs because they're crap. Posted by Nellie French
When Rosa Parks refused to move from her bus seat, did the whole world stand by and watch?
No. The movers and shakers mobilized to confront a serious problem. There's no denying women earn less than men. Leaders stand up and fight for justice and change. It's time, women and men, it's time. Posted by S.H.B
"There's no denying that children earn less than men."
And women with children and familiy responsibilities earn less than women without. And men whose wives also work earn less than men whose wives stay home and mind the kids. Posted by Sifto
"There's no denying that women earn less than men."
And women with children and familiy responsibilities earn less than women without. And men whose wives also work earn less than men whose wives stay home and mind the kids. Posted by Sifto
“If you prefer to spend all your spare time growing roses or playing with your children, I like you better, but do not complain that you are not being promoted fast enough.”
David Ogilvy Posted by Anonymous
“If you prefer to spend all your spare time growing roses or playing with your children, I like you better, but do not complain that you are not being promoted fast enough.”
For me, that says it all. Posted by pc babe
The last time I looked at a brain, I did not see a penis or a Vagina attached to it. I have had the honour of working with great people over my career as a creative guy. Carol Marino back in 1968 was my partner on British Leyland Motors (a car account) She left years later to pursue a love for photography. Jane Pritchard, a wonderfully talented creative person and Lorraine Tao when she was starting her career at Y&R, (I directed a preparation H spot for her.) Troy Maclure who I worked on projects with at Taxi. Others who I did not work with but respected a lot like Marlene Hore, Joanne Lehman, Marta Cutler, Janet & Nancy and Judy at Burnett, and many more. As a teacher for the past 3 years at St Clair College in Windsor, I'm finding that more women than men want to become Writers and Art Directors. I do everything I can to condition their brains for the wild and wacky world of Advertising. Over time, everything changes... for the better.
Posted by Gord Oglan
pc babe,
not sure that quote really says it all for all of us. vonk never complained about not being promoted fast enough. she complained about the discrimination that is rooted in sexism. french took it to another level when he "joked" women are crap. he (and people like him) create hostile work environments that lead to litigation---hence, the efforts to suppress the infamous dvd. additionally, the attitude must change, as both men and women are no longer willing to subscribe to ogilvy's obsession theory or french's committment mandates. despite all the emotional online outbursts, the original essay by vonk was not a mean-spirited attack. the same cannot be said for french.'s words. that's why he's no longer employed while vonk is. ogilvy had another famous line: the consumer is not an idiot. she's your wife. and now that she's gaining power in the workplace, look out. Posted by pc dude
"pc babe,
not sure that quote really says it all for all of us." pc dude, l wouldn't dream of trying to speak for 'all of us'. Unlike Vonk, who seems to think she can happily speak for all women, as she so clearly suggested in her Canada AM interview. As for French's words being a mean spirited attack - upon whom? I was there that evening, and certainly didn't feel attackedd in any way. Actually, I spent most of the evening laughing. The reality is that Neil was absolutely right. Fewer women become female CDs because more women than men take time off to have children/look after children/put their childen first before their careers. Just like Nancy is doing right now. I applaud her actions, although not her unfortunate words. Posted by pc babe
well, this conversation has degraded to repetitve, circular debating.
if the reality is neil french was absolutely right, why is he absolutely unemployed? also, i thought you wouldn't dream of trying to speak for 'all of us.' smooches. Posted by pc dude
Is Neil "absolutely unemployed"? As far as I have read, he doesn't leave WPP until April, and still draws a paycheck. That's the kind of joblessness I'd love to enjoy.
But as for why he is in the position he is in, well because political correctness demands it. This one evening drew more attention to the WPP and this navel-gazing fishbowl of an industry we're in than anything else, and something had to be done. What if Neil made similar sexist remarks amongst a smaller group of people? I'm sure he has, especially if this is his mindset. In fact I know he has because Nancy says so in her own article. So why wasn't he fired or forced to resign then? His remarks and actions were just as disparaging then, so why didn't WPP do anything about them in the past? Because they, just like Nancy, simply brushed it off and said 'oh, that's just old Neil, the incorrigible codger.' Well guess what? A Night With Neil French was still 'just old Neil'. The next day, it was 'just old Neil.' Even when Nancy's article went online on this very site, to the WPP, it was still 'just old Neil.' It wasn't until the outside world took notice that 'just old Neil' became 'sexist dinosaur who deserves to be fired old Neil'. Posted by Saratoga Sammy
pc dude...oh pc dude. There's something about you that makes me think you may be female like me...perhaps adding more fuel to the fire.
Posted by pc babe
pc babe,
definitely not female. definitely not seeking to add fuel—just watching the dying bonfire. and the truth is, there aren't many females like you, at least not on these threads. but i guess that's what makes it all so entertaining. saratoga sammy, french's words were more than politically incorrect. they were fuel for litigation. and it is sad that it takes the outside world to initiate change in the business. Posted by pc dude
A for originality all, A+
Posted by S.H.B.
Bingo!
Posted by pc babe
Dear J,
I thought I told you not to read this tripe. go to bed. tp Posted by ham or turkey
PC Dude,
Neil's words were fuel for litigation? Big deal, so is an off the cuff remark about how hot the new agency receptionist is (hypothetically speaking. I have no idea how hot your receptionist is.) Posted by Saratoga Sammy
saratoga,
all i meant to say was that someone in his position places a worldwide organization in dire straits. every woman in the wpp network considering a sexual harassment lawsuit would have evidence that the company is potentially discriminatory towards women. it's a lot worse than remarking about the hotness of the receptionist. in our suit-crazed society, our leaders must be more careful with the words and actions. i don't like the reality, but that's what it is. Posted by pc dude
Westerners talk a lot...to a fault. I am a Filipino and in the Philippines, we never talk too much about something, we just work and things just turn out well. We like it simple and the West can learn a thing or two from the way we see things.
Posted by Royce
I think it was on ihavenidea where I read an excellent interview with David Droga. He was asked at one time who was the first person he called when he got The Agency Of The Year in Cannes with Saatchi NY. It was his mother. And I know for sure who will be the person I’ll call when I’ll have my first Gold or GP. It will be my mother.
Are you ready to give that away for a better job? I’m afraid YOU might be… but gladly, nature will never let that happen. Now… I’m a young guy from Romania, Eastern Europe… we don’t have to deal with this politically corectness crap just yet, the news come to us at a lower speed… we’re far away… we don’t know much. But I knew about Neil French long before I knew your names and I only know your names since this scandal in which you took into your hands the most powerful weapon of conformity (politically corectness) and you used it with such a talent that for a moment you put down on his knees a MAN that did not conform. Ever. Posted by iec
|
| Home | The
Work | Creatives | Articles | Events | Literature | Jobs | Adblogs Forum | Directory | Resources | Ask Jancy | Academia | Sponsors | About |
| ©2001-2007 ihaveanidea Inc.
All rights reserved. Terms
of Use No material contained in this site may be republished or reposted. |
Janet Kestin
Co-Chief Creative Officer
Ogilvy Toronto
It’s interesting that so many people, sadly mostly men, horribly maybe mostly young men, are pillorying Nancy for expressing her counter-argument to Neil’s point of view. Why is Neil’s freedom of speech to be defended and Nancy’s attacked? Frankly, why is the entire dialogue centered around Nancy and Neil rather than standing back and recognizing that an issue is being raised here?
So far, most women in our business do less well than men. There are a lot of reasons for this. Here are a few that I’ve heard. Recruiters have told me that men typically request male partners when they’re looking to hire. Women in male-female partnerships say that many clients address all their comments to the man, just like when you go to buy a car or ask for a loan along with your husband. Girls in ad schools tell us that their male professors try to discourage them from attempting this as a life’s work since it’s quite hard and they’ll probably just go off to have babies anyway. I’ve even heard that all the great artists, sculptors and writers through history were men, so maybe it’s also true of advertising creativity.
Then there are the hurdles we put in our own way: we don’t make enough of our accomplishments, don’t ask for what we deserve, compromise when we shouldn’t, wait till we’re sure before we speak up. We don’t fight for ourselves because nice girls don’t. Of course we don’t. Ambitious men are driven. Ambitious women are bitches. No stereotypes there.
It’s embarrassing how slowly we change. Of course, advertising isn’t unique. .Many industries think like ours. And women’s progress is slow everywhere. The systems of business were created by men and large numbers of women in the workforce is a comparatively new phenomenon. In the past, if women wanted to succeed they behaved like men. Now, 60% of the students graduating from universities are women. They are the new intellectual capital and they’re not so willing to change. Every day, there are articles about how business is trying to become more liveable, more humane in order to keep the best employees. A lot of those employees are now women. Sabbaticals, training, heck, even yoga, are making their way into the halls of corporate life – or what I might call nouveau corporate life. It dares to suggest that you can succeed in business without giving everything else up.
Nancy has a child. So do I. And Judy John.and Karen Howe. None of our kids is in reform school. We have good lives. It hasn’t gotten in the way of our progress. I think we deserve credit for that, but our agencies deserve it, too. They’ve created environments where women can do well. To some degree, they’ve allowed us to design our own jobs; Nancy and I work together so we don’t short-change our agency or our families; Judy works hand in hand with her president and has defined the particular conditions that allow her to be a good creative director and a good mom. Her agency is strong; Karen’s CEO, Mark Weisbarth, is a born feminist and proud of it. Elspeth Lynn and Lorraine Tao started their own shop with the highly-evolved Andy Macauley. Their agency is a rocket. I don’t know, but it’s possible that, though there aren’t many of us, our small Canadian community can boast more female CDs than anywhere on the planet. We’re in a creative business and a little creative thinking was applied to make things work. These agencies didn’t fall back on hoary, old assumptions. They’ve recognized that women need different conditions to succeed and they’ve gone for it.
Here are some of the things that stand in women’s way: according to Catalyst, a leading women’s research and advisory organization: a lack of mentors, exclusion from formal networks (still primarily boys’ clubs) and stereotypes and preconceptions about their abilities or commitment.
I don’t accept that women aren’t as good as men nor are they less hard-working. I’d suggest that many of them work much harder since they don’t have wives at home doing things for them. The simple fact is that women can’t succeed unless someone wants them to. And so far, not enough people want that.
One of the young guys who works for us said to me that he had never known there was sexism in the ad business until he heard Neil speak. But many of our business’s ad legends, Lee Clow, Steve Hayden, Kevin Roddy are certainly keenly aware as my son pointed out this morning when he said, ‘Hasn’t anybody looked at the AWNY (Advertising Women of New York) film where they interview all those big guys in drag about the sad situation of women in your business?” If you haven’t seen it, do yourself a favour and check it out.
Most of my women friends are very successful whatever their field of endeavour. Many of them also have children. My son thought the world was run by women until he was 16 and a helpful teacher decided to enlighten him. His role models have been people of both genders working hard and doing well. He won’t make assumptions. I hope we don’t have to wait for his generation to grow up to see the world become a fairer place.
Let’s all get a grip: advertising is a thinking job. It doesn’t require being tied to a desk. It can be done before breakfast, and after tucking in. What it does require is having a brain and the last time I looked women had at least as many of those as men.
Oh – one last thing, when you write to tell me how wrong I am, have the guts to sign your name.
What are your thoughts on the excerpt from Hadji's book?